Fine-grained semantics for attitude reports

I observe that the “concept-generator” theory of Percus and Sauerland (2003) , Anand (2006), Charlow Sharvit (2014) does not predict an intuitive true interpretation sentence “Plato did believe Hesperus was Phosphorus”. In response, present a simple attitude reports which employs fine-grained semantics for names, according to names intuitively name same thing may have distinct compositional semantic values. This solves problem with concept-generator theory, but, as go on show, it has problems its own. three examples can accommodate, but cannot. These motivate full paper, combines basic ideas behind names. The themselves are interest independently my theory: two them constrain original more tightly than previously discussed had. EARLY ACCESS